What Could Drive Seung Hui Cho to Kill?

It is a miserable week all around the country this week when a senior undergrad started shooting at individual understudies at an unassuming community school. To begin with, he started shooting in an elevated structure quarters. After two hours, he gunned down a few additional understudies in a moment floor homeroom.

Seung Hui Cho, a South, not set in stone to be liable for the slaughter that happened at Virginia Tech (VT) on April 16, 2007. With guns that he bought a little while prior, he transformed the grounds into a shooting display that ended the existences of 32 VT understudies as well as his own.

What happened in the psyche of this young fellow? What might actually drive him to an intellectually discouraged express that eventually lead to him to snap as he did? Is it conceivable that he didn’t have a huiswiki decent home life? Is it true or not that he was a casualty of bullyism in school like Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, the understudies to whom Cho alludes as saints, from the Columbine episode?

Rushes to censure Mr. Cho for the shootings or is there something more that should be researched? We could estimate that Mr. Cho had mental issues coming from his young life.

Truth be told, it was subsequently detailed after the shooting binge that Seung Hui Cho was a casualty of provoking by individual colleagues while he was in school not long after his appearance in the U.S. in 1992. Because of his absence of order of the English language, cohorts derided him for “having something in his mouth” while he talked.

Might it at some point be deduced that long stretches of these insults drove Cho into sorrow? Is it conceivable that these insults were a type of verbal bullyism caused for him? Did he attempt to fit in and was eventually dismissed due to looking as well “Oriental?” Was he dismissed for his alleged “discourse obstruction?”

These are few numerous unanswered inquiries that could have lead Cho to detonate past the words he depicted in his exploratory writing classes. As a matter of fact, I accept that he is alluding to individuals from the American standard society in his video pronouncement. In particular, the “you” is the all-American rich children that he discusses. He begrudged their way of life. He begrudged their “gold neckbands” and their “trust reserves” since he didn’t have them as he was growing up.


Leave a Reply